address merge conflicts
This commit is contained in:
commit
5c433a0689
BIN
lib/dnsjava-2.0.8-vrsn-2.jar
Normal file
BIN
lib/dnsjava-2.0.8-vrsn-2.jar
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
BIN
lib/log4j-1.2.15.jar
Normal file
BIN
lib/log4j-1.2.15.jar
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
104
src/com/verisign/cl/DNSSECReconciler.java
Normal file
104
src/com/verisign/cl/DNSSECReconciler.java
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
|
||||
package com.verisign.cl;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.util.*;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.xbill.DNS.*;
|
||||
import com.verisign.tat.dnssec.CaptiveValidator;
|
||||
|
||||
public class DNSSECReconciler {
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Invoke with java -jar dnssecreconciler.jar server=127.0.0.1 \
|
||||
* query_file=queries.txt dnskey_query=net dnskey_query=edu
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private CaptiveValidator validator;
|
||||
|
||||
// Options
|
||||
public String server;
|
||||
public String query;
|
||||
public String queryFile;
|
||||
public String dnskeyFile;
|
||||
public List<String> dnskeyNames;
|
||||
|
||||
DNSSECReconciler() {
|
||||
validator = new CaptiveValidator();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void execute() {
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static void usage() {
|
||||
System.err.println("usage: java -jar dnssecreconiler.jar [..options..]");
|
||||
System.err.println(" server: the DNS server to query.");
|
||||
System.err.println(" query: a name [type [flags]] string.");
|
||||
System.err.println(" query_file: a list of queries, one query per line.");
|
||||
System.err.println(" dnskey_file: a file containing DNSKEY RRs to trust.");
|
||||
System.err.println(" dnskey_query: query 'server' for DNSKEY at given name to trust, may repeat");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public static int main(String[] argv) {
|
||||
|
||||
DNSSECReconciler dr = new DNSSECReconciler();
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// Parse the command line options
|
||||
for (String arg : argv) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (arg.indexOf('=') < 0) {
|
||||
System.err.println("Unrecognized option: " + arg);
|
||||
usage();
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
String[] split_arg = arg.split("[ \t]*=[ \t]*", 2);
|
||||
String opt = split_arg[0];
|
||||
String optarg = split_arg[1];
|
||||
|
||||
if (opt.equals("server")) {
|
||||
dr.server = optarg;
|
||||
} else if (opt.equals("query_file")) {
|
||||
dr.queryFile = optarg;
|
||||
} else if (opt.equals("dnskey_file")) {
|
||||
dr.dnskeyFile = optarg;
|
||||
} else if (opt.equals("dnskey_query")) {
|
||||
if (dr.dnskeyNames == null) {
|
||||
dr.dnskeyNames = new ArrayList<String>();
|
||||
}
|
||||
dr.dnskeyNames.add(optarg);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
System.err.println("Unrecognized option: " + opt);
|
||||
usage();
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for minimum usage
|
||||
if (dr.server == null) {
|
||||
System.err.println("'server' must be specified");
|
||||
usage();
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (dr.query == null && dr.queryFile == null) {
|
||||
System.err.println("Either 'query' or 'query_file' must be specified");
|
||||
usage();
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (dr.dnskeyFile == null && dr.dnskeyNames == null) {
|
||||
System.err.println("Either 'dnskey_file' or 'dnskey_query' must be specified");
|
||||
usage();
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Execute the job
|
||||
dr.execute();
|
||||
|
||||
} catch (Exception e) {
|
||||
e.printStackTrace();
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
@ -49,10 +49,13 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
private DnsSecVerifier mVerifier;
|
||||
private Logger log = Logger.getLogger(this.getClass());
|
||||
|
||||
private List<String> mErrorList;
|
||||
|
||||
public CaptiveValidator() {
|
||||
mVerifier = new DnsSecVerifier();
|
||||
mValUtils = new ValUtils(mVerifier);
|
||||
mTrustedKeys = new TrustAnchorStore();
|
||||
mVerifier = new DnsSecVerifier();
|
||||
mValUtils = new ValUtils(mVerifier);
|
||||
mTrustedKeys = new TrustAnchorStore();
|
||||
mErrorList = new ArrayList<String>();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------- Module Initialization -------------------
|
||||
@ -205,7 +208,7 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
// Follow the CNAME chain.
|
||||
if (type == Type.CNAME) {
|
||||
if (rrset.size() > 1) {
|
||||
log.debug("Found CNAME rrset with size > 1: " + rrset);
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Found CNAME rrset with size > 1: " + rrset);
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.INVALID);
|
||||
|
||||
return m;
|
||||
@ -363,8 +366,8 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
// If the (answer) rrset failed to validate, then this message is
|
||||
// BAD.
|
||||
if (status != SecurityStatus.SECURE) {
|
||||
log.debug("Positive response has failed ANSWER rrset: "
|
||||
+ rrsets[i]);
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Positive response has failed ANSWER rrset: " +
|
||||
rrsets[i]);
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -389,11 +392,10 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
int status = mValUtils.verifySRRset(rrsets[i], key_rrset);
|
||||
|
||||
// If anything in the authority section fails to be secure, we have
|
||||
// a
|
||||
// bad message.
|
||||
// a bad message.
|
||||
if (status != SecurityStatus.SECURE) {
|
||||
log.debug("Positive response has failed AUTHORITY rrset: "
|
||||
+ rrsets[i]);
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Positive response has failed AUTHORITY rrset: " +
|
||||
rrsets[i]);
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -410,8 +412,7 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
Name nsec_wc = ValUtils.nsecWildcard(qname, nsec);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!wc.equals(nsec_wc)) {
|
||||
// log.debug("Positive wildcard response wasn't generated "
|
||||
// + "by the correct wildcard");
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Positive wildcard response wasn't generated by the correct wildcard");
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -437,7 +438,7 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
// records.
|
||||
if ((wc != null) && !wcNSEC_ok && (nsec3s != null)) {
|
||||
if (NSEC3ValUtils.proveWildcard(nsec3s, qname, key_rrset.getName(),
|
||||
wc)) {
|
||||
wc, mErrorList)) {
|
||||
wcNSEC_ok = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -489,8 +490,8 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
// have
|
||||
// a bad message.
|
||||
if (status != SecurityStatus.SECURE) {
|
||||
log.debug("Positive response has failed AUTHORITY rrset: "
|
||||
+ rrsets[i]);
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Positive response has failed AUTHORITY rrset: " +
|
||||
rrsets[i]);
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -538,6 +539,7 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
// Now to check to see if we have a valid combination of things.
|
||||
if (delegation == null) {
|
||||
// somehow we have a referral without an NS rrset.
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Apparent referral does not contain NS RRset");
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -546,6 +548,7 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
if (secure_delegation) {
|
||||
if ((nsec != null) || ((nsec3s != null) && (nsec3s.size() > 0))) {
|
||||
// we found both a DS rrset *and* NSEC/NSEC3 rrsets!
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Referral contains both DS and NSEC/NSEC3 RRsets");
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -564,6 +567,7 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
if (status != SecurityStatus.SECURE) {
|
||||
// The NSEC *must* prove that there was no DS record. The
|
||||
// INSECURE state here is still bogus.
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Referral does not contain a NSEC record proving no DS");
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -575,12 +579,12 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (nsec3s.size() > 0) {
|
||||
byte status = NSEC3ValUtils
|
||||
.proveNoDS(nsec3s, delegation, nsec3zone);
|
||||
byte status = NSEC3ValUtils.proveNoDS(nsec3s, delegation, nsec3zone, mErrorList);
|
||||
|
||||
if (status != SecurityStatus.SECURE) {
|
||||
// the NSEC3 RRs MUST prove no DS, so the INDETERMINATE state is
|
||||
// actually bogus
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Referral does not contain NSEC3 record(s) proving no DS");
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -592,11 +596,12 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// failed to find proof either way.
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Referral does not contain proof of no DS");
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void validateCNAMEResponse(SMessage message, SRRset key_rrset) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
// FIXME: write CNAME validation code.
|
||||
private void validateCNAMEResponse(SMessage message, SRRset key_rrset) {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Given an "ANY" response -- a response that contains an answer to a
|
||||
@ -640,8 +645,8 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
// If the (answer) rrset failed to validate, then this message is
|
||||
// BAD.
|
||||
if (status != SecurityStatus.SECURE) {
|
||||
log.debug("Positive response has failed ANSWER rrset: "
|
||||
+ rrsets[i]);
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Positive response has failed ANSWER rrset: " +
|
||||
rrsets[i]);
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -656,11 +661,10 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
int status = mValUtils.verifySRRset(rrsets[i], key_rrset);
|
||||
|
||||
// If anything in the authority section fails to be secure, we have
|
||||
// a
|
||||
// bad message.
|
||||
// a bad message.
|
||||
if (status != SecurityStatus.SECURE) {
|
||||
log.debug("Positive response has failed AUTHORITY rrset: "
|
||||
+ rrsets[i]);
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Positive response has failed AUTHORITY rrset: " +
|
||||
rrsets[i]);
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -689,9 +693,9 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
* @param key_rrset
|
||||
* The trusted DNSKEY rrset that signs this response.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private void validateNodataResponse(SMessage message, SRRset key_rrset) {
|
||||
Name qname = message.getQName();
|
||||
int qtype = message.getQType();
|
||||
private void validateNodataResponse(SMessage message, SRRset key_rrset, List<String> errorList) {
|
||||
Name qname = message.getQName();
|
||||
int qtype = message.getQType();
|
||||
|
||||
SMessage m = message;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -722,8 +726,8 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
int status = mValUtils.verifySRRset(rrsets[i], key_rrset);
|
||||
|
||||
if (status != SecurityStatus.SECURE) {
|
||||
log.debug("NODATA response has failed AUTHORITY rrset: "
|
||||
+ rrsets[i]);
|
||||
mErrorList.add("NODATA response has failed AUTHORITY rrset: " +
|
||||
rrsets[i]);
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -779,13 +783,14 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
if (!hasValidNSEC && (nsec3s != null) && (nsec3s.size() > 0)) {
|
||||
// try to prove NODATA with our NSEC3 record(s)
|
||||
hasValidNSEC = NSEC3ValUtils.proveNodata(nsec3s, qname, qtype,
|
||||
nsec3Signer);
|
||||
nsec3Signer, errorList);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasValidNSEC) {
|
||||
log.debug("NODATA response failed to prove NODATA "
|
||||
+ "status with NSEC/NSEC3");
|
||||
log.trace("Failed NODATA:\n" + m);
|
||||
mErrorList.add("NODATA response failed to prove NODATA status with NSEC/NSEC3");
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -818,8 +823,9 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
SMessage m = message;
|
||||
|
||||
if (message.getCount(Section.ANSWER) > 0) {
|
||||
log
|
||||
.warn("NAME ERROR response contained records in the ANSWER SECTION");
|
||||
log.warn(
|
||||
"NameError response contained records in the ANSWER SECTION");
|
||||
mErrorList.add("NameError response contained records in the ANSWER SECTION");
|
||||
message.setStatus(SecurityStatus.INVALID);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -838,8 +844,8 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
int status = mValUtils.verifySRRset(rrsets[i], key_rrset);
|
||||
|
||||
if (status != SecurityStatus.SECURE) {
|
||||
log.debug("NameError response has failed AUTHORITY rrset: "
|
||||
+ rrsets[i]);
|
||||
mErrorList.add("NameError response has failed AUTHORITY rrset: " +
|
||||
rrsets[i]);
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -882,8 +888,8 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
hasValidNSEC = NSEC3ValUtils.proveNameError(nsec3s, qname,
|
||||
nsec3Signer);
|
||||
hasValidNSEC = NSEC3ValUtils.proveNameError(nsec3s, qname,
|
||||
nsec3Signer, mErrorList);
|
||||
|
||||
// Note that we assume that the NSEC3ValUtils proofs encompass the
|
||||
// wildcard part of the proof.
|
||||
@ -892,16 +898,14 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
|
||||
// If the message fails to prove either condition, it is bogus.
|
||||
if (!hasValidNSEC) {
|
||||
log.debug("NameError response has failed to prove: "
|
||||
+ "qname does not exist");
|
||||
mErrorList.add("NameError response has failed to prove qname does not exist");
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasValidWCNSEC) {
|
||||
log.debug("NameError response has failed to prove: "
|
||||
+ "covering wildcard does not exist");
|
||||
mErrorList.add("NameError response has failed to prove covering wildcard does not exist");
|
||||
m.setStatus(SecurityStatus.BOGUS);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -913,6 +917,7 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public byte validateMessage(SMessage message, Name zone) {
|
||||
mErrorList.clear();
|
||||
if (!zone.isAbsolute()) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
zone = Name.concatenate(zone, Name.root);
|
||||
@ -934,6 +939,7 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
SRRset key_rrset = findKeys(message);
|
||||
|
||||
if (key_rrset == null) {
|
||||
mErrorList.add("Failed to find matching DNSKEYs for the response");
|
||||
return SecurityStatus.BOGUS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -952,9 +958,9 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case NODATA:
|
||||
log.trace("Validating a NODATA response");
|
||||
validateNodataResponse(message, key_rrset);
|
||||
case NODATA:
|
||||
log.trace("Validating a NODATA response");
|
||||
validateNodataResponse(message, key_rrset, mErrorList);
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -994,4 +1000,8 @@ public class CaptiveValidator {
|
||||
public List<String> listTrustedKeys() {
|
||||
return mTrustedKeys.listTrustAnchors();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public List<String> getErrorList() {
|
||||
return mErrorList;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -231,16 +231,16 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
* An already allocated comparator. This may be null.
|
||||
* @return True if the NSEC3Record covers the hash.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private static boolean nsec3Covers(NSEC3Record nsec3, byte[] hash,
|
||||
ByteArrayComparator bac) {
|
||||
byte[] owner = hash(nsec3.getName(), nsec3);
|
||||
byte[] next = nsec3.getNext();
|
||||
private static boolean nsec3Covers(NSEC3Record nsec3, byte [] hash,
|
||||
ByteArrayComparator bac) {
|
||||
Name ownerName = nsec3.getName();
|
||||
byte [] owner = b32.fromString(ownerName.getLabelString(0));
|
||||
byte [] next = nsec3.getNext();
|
||||
|
||||
// This is the "normal case: owner < next and owner < hash < next
|
||||
if ((bac.compare(owner, hash) < 0) && (bac.compare(hash, next) < 0)) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// this is the end of zone case: next < owner && hash > owner || hash <
|
||||
// next
|
||||
if ((bac.compare(next, owner) <= 0)
|
||||
@ -317,8 +317,8 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
// FIXME: modify so that the NSEC3 matching the zone apex need not be
|
||||
// present.
|
||||
while (n.labels() >= zonename.labels()) {
|
||||
nsec3 = findMatchingNSEC3(hash(n, params), zonename, nsec3s,
|
||||
params, bac);
|
||||
nsec3 = findMatchingNSEC3(hash(n, params), zonename,
|
||||
nsec3s, params, bac);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nsec3 != null) {
|
||||
return new CEResponse(n, nsec3);
|
||||
@ -351,22 +351,23 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
* that matches it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private static CEResponse proveClosestEncloser(Name qname, Name zonename,
|
||||
List<NSEC3Record> nsec3s, NSEC3Parameters params,
|
||||
ByteArrayComparator bac, boolean proveDoesNotExist) {
|
||||
List<NSEC3Record> nsec3s, NSEC3Parameters params,
|
||||
ByteArrayComparator bac, boolean proveDoesNotExist, List<String> errorList) {
|
||||
CEResponse candidate = findClosestEncloser(qname, zonename, nsec3s,
|
||||
params, bac);
|
||||
|
||||
if (candidate == null) {
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveClosestEncloser: could not find a "
|
||||
+ "candidate for the closest encloser.");
|
||||
errorList.add("Could not find a candidate for the closest encloser");
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveClosestEncloser: could not find a " +
|
||||
"candidate for the closest encloser.");
|
||||
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (candidate.closestEncloser.equals(qname)) {
|
||||
if (proveDoesNotExist) {
|
||||
st_log
|
||||
.debug("proveClosestEncloser: proved that qname existed!");
|
||||
errorList.add("Proven closest encloser proved that the qname existed and should not have");
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveClosestEncloser: proved that qname existed!");
|
||||
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -380,15 +381,17 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
// should have been a referral. If it is a DNAME, then it should have
|
||||
// been
|
||||
// a DNAME response.
|
||||
if (candidate.ce_nsec3.hasType(Type.NS)
|
||||
&& !candidate.ce_nsec3.hasType(Type.SOA)) {
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveClosestEncloser: closest encloser "
|
||||
+ "was a delegation!");
|
||||
if (candidate.ce_nsec3.hasType(Type.NS) &&
|
||||
!candidate.ce_nsec3.hasType(Type.SOA)) {
|
||||
errorList.add("Proven closest encloser was a delegation");
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveClosestEncloser: closest encloser " +
|
||||
"was a delegation!");
|
||||
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (candidate.ce_nsec3.hasType(Type.DNAME)) {
|
||||
errorList.add("Proven closest encloser was a DNAME");
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveClosestEncloser: closest encloser was a DNAME!");
|
||||
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
@ -402,8 +405,10 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
params, bac);
|
||||
|
||||
if (candidate.nc_nsec3 == null) {
|
||||
st_log.debug("Could not find proof that the "
|
||||
+ "closest encloser was the closest encloser");
|
||||
errorList.add("Could not find proof that the closest encloser was the closest encloser");
|
||||
errorList.add("hash " + hashName(nc_hash, zonename) + " is not covered by any NSEC3 RRs");
|
||||
st_log.debug("Could not find proof that the " +
|
||||
"closest encloser was the closest encloser");
|
||||
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -519,7 +524,7 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
* ignored.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public static boolean proveNameError(List<NSEC3Record> nsec3s, Name qname,
|
||||
Name zonename) {
|
||||
Name zonename, List<String> errorList) {
|
||||
if ((nsec3s == null) || (nsec3s.size() == 0)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -527,8 +532,9 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
NSEC3Parameters nsec3params = nsec3Parameters(nsec3s);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nsec3params == null) {
|
||||
st_log.debug("Could not find a single set of "
|
||||
+ "NSEC3 parameters (multiple parameters present).");
|
||||
errorList.add("Could not find a single set of NSEC3 parameters (multiple parameters present");
|
||||
st_log.debug("Could not find a single set of " +
|
||||
"NSEC3 parameters (multiple parameters present).");
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -538,9 +544,10 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
// First locate and prove the closest encloser to qname. We will use the
|
||||
// variant that fails if the closest encloser turns out to be qname.
|
||||
CEResponse ce = proveClosestEncloser(qname, zonename, nsec3s,
|
||||
nsec3params, bac, true);
|
||||
nsec3params, bac, true, errorList);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ce == null) {
|
||||
errorList.add("Failed to find the closest encloser as part of the NSEC3 proof");
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveNameError: failed to prove a closest encloser.");
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
@ -555,8 +562,9 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
nsec3params, bac);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nsec3 == null) {
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveNameError: could not prove that the "
|
||||
+ "applicable wildcard did not exist.");
|
||||
errorList.add("Failed to prove that the applicable wildcard did not exist");
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveNameError: could not prove that the " +
|
||||
"applicable wildcard did not exist.");
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -595,7 +603,7 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
* @return true if the NSEC3s prove the proposition.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public static boolean proveNodata(List<NSEC3Record> nsec3s, Name qname,
|
||||
int qtype, Name zonename) {
|
||||
int qtype, Name zonename, List<String> errorList) {
|
||||
if ((nsec3s == null) || (nsec3s.size() == 0)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -637,7 +645,7 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
// match qname. Although, at this point, we know that it won't since we
|
||||
// just checked that.
|
||||
CEResponse ce = proveClosestEncloser(qname, zonename, nsec3s,
|
||||
nsec3params, bac, true);
|
||||
nsec3params, bac, true, errorList);
|
||||
|
||||
// At this point, not finding a match or a proven closest encloser is a
|
||||
// problem.
|
||||
@ -700,7 +708,7 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
* @return true if the NSEC3 records prove this case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public static boolean proveWildcard(List<NSEC3Record> nsec3s, Name qname,
|
||||
Name zonename, Name wildcard) {
|
||||
Name zonename, Name wildcard, List<String> errorList) {
|
||||
if ((nsec3s == null) || (nsec3s.size() == 0)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -712,8 +720,9 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
NSEC3Parameters nsec3params = nsec3Parameters(nsec3s);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nsec3params == null) {
|
||||
st_log
|
||||
.debug("couldn't find a single set of NSEC3 parameters (multiple parameters present).");
|
||||
errorList.add("Could not find a single set of NSEC3 parameters (multiple parameters present)");
|
||||
st_log.debug(
|
||||
"couldn't find a single set of NSEC3 parameters (multiple parameters present).");
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -732,10 +741,13 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
zonename, nsec3s, nsec3params, bac);
|
||||
|
||||
if (candidate.nc_nsec3 == null) {
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveWildcard: did not find a covering NSEC3 "
|
||||
+ "that covered the next closer name to " + qname
|
||||
+ " from " + candidate.closestEncloser
|
||||
+ " (derived from wildcard " + wildcard + ")");
|
||||
errorList.add("Did not find a NSEC3 that covered the next closer name to '" +
|
||||
qname + "' from '" + candidate.closestEncloser + "' (derived from the wildcard: " +
|
||||
wildcard + ")");
|
||||
st_log.debug("proveWildcard: did not find a covering NSEC3 " +
|
||||
"that covered the next closer name to " + qname + " from " +
|
||||
candidate.closestEncloser + " (derived from wildcard " +
|
||||
wildcard + ")");
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -763,7 +775,7 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
* work out.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public static byte proveNoDS(List<NSEC3Record> nsec3s, Name qname,
|
||||
Name zonename) {
|
||||
Name zonename, List<String> errorList) {
|
||||
if ((nsec3s == null) || (nsec3s.size() == 0)) {
|
||||
return SecurityStatus.BOGUS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -771,8 +783,9 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
NSEC3Parameters nsec3params = nsec3Parameters(nsec3s);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nsec3params == null) {
|
||||
st_log.debug("couldn't find a single set of "
|
||||
+ "NSEC3 parameters (multiple parameters present).");
|
||||
errorList.add("Could not find a single set of NSEC3 parameters (multiple parameters present)");
|
||||
st_log.debug("couldn't find a single set of " +
|
||||
"NSEC3 parameters (multiple parameters present).");
|
||||
|
||||
return SecurityStatus.BOGUS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -788,6 +801,7 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
// zone (the child instead of the parent). If it has the DS bit set,
|
||||
// then we were lied to.
|
||||
if (nsec3.hasType(Type.SOA) || nsec3.hasType(Type.DS)) {
|
||||
errorList.add("Matching NSEC3 is incorrectly from the child instead of the parent (SOA or DS bit set)");
|
||||
return SecurityStatus.BOGUS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -803,9 +817,10 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise, we are probably in the opt-in case.
|
||||
CEResponse ce = proveClosestEncloser(qname, zonename, nsec3s,
|
||||
nsec3params, bac, true);
|
||||
nsec3params, bac, true, errorList);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ce == null) {
|
||||
errorList.add("Failed to prove the closest encloser as part of a 'No DS' proof");
|
||||
return SecurityStatus.BOGUS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -816,6 +831,7 @@ public class NSEC3ValUtils {
|
||||
return SecurityStatus.SECURE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
errorList.add("Failed to find a covering NSEC3 for 'No DS' proof");
|
||||
return SecurityStatus.BOGUS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user